For your second major oral presentation of the semester, you will be delivering

For your second major oral presentation of the semester, you will be delivering a persuasive-
natured presentation. The oral presentation and the typed key-word outline as well as the typed
Works-Cited page for the presentation are all due at the beginning of class the oral presentation will be delivered in person during class time while the
typed key-word outline and the typed Works Cited page will be submitted through Canvas
no later than the first five minutes of class on August 1st. Your topic must fall under one of the
two following areas: a social issue (such as child abuse, teen-age pregnancy, etc.) or an
institutional problem (health-care reform, illegal immigration, welfare reform, etc.). You must
bring the following items with you to class on the appropriate due date of this assignment:
 I can provide my own PowerPoint.
Just need the outline and speech.
Thank you

Your Assignment Write a free-response essay addressing the following question: I

Your Assignment
Write a free-response essay addressing the following question:
In the novel Jane Eyre, Jane faces a struggle between conscience and passion throughout the final section. Considering the last few chapters of the novel, does conscience or passion win? How does her fight between conscience and passion contribute to the novel as a whole? Write a well-organized essay in which you answer these questions, supporting your thesis with evidence from the novel.
What You Turn In
• Your essay should be approximately one to two pages in length. Use one-inch margins and a 12-point font.
• The first paragraph should contain a thesis statement in which you clearly present the argument you want to make in your essay.
• Each body paragraph should begin with a topic sentence in which you clearly state the argument for that paragraph.
• Be sure to support your arguments with brief, relevant examples. Each body paragraph
should include at least three pieces of supporting evidence and should be clearly linked together with intelligent commentary.
• When using direct quotations from the text, document your citation using standard conventions (for example, use line numbers when quoting poems, act and scene numbers for drama, and page numbers for fiction).

OTHER: Hello, my professor has submitted feedback on this paper. We will perform

OTHER: Hello, my professor has submitted feedback on this paper. We will perform a rewrite based on these suggestions. Please follow these feedbacks to rewrite this paper.
This is an interesting topic, but it seems to fall outside the assignment here. To reiterate, the assigment is this:
“How do Kennedy, Romney, Obama, and Trump define American religious and political values, and American pluralism? What do these values reveal to us about professed American religious “tolerance”? Is “tolerance” a goal we should be shooting for, or can we imagine a different sense of community altogether? For more information on the ambiguous nature of tolerance, search here. Do you think any sort of professed “tolerance” extends to Islam in this country? Do you think any of these presidents (or presidential candiates) would be in support of, or could envision, a Muslim president?”
I’m not seeing the paper addressing any of the speeches of the men other than Trump in detail, or, any of these questions about tolerance more broadly.
If you choose to rewrite this paper, you will want to explore all of the speeches in depth (or you could choose two, perhaps, to compare), and analyze and compare them in terms of how they see religious identity or faith as an integral part of political leadership (or not), and how they have constructed and centered a particular normative (Christian) identity in the process of asserting a “tolerance” for diversity. In other words, how do these speeches “center” Christian belief and identity at the same time they “other” non-Christian religions and peoples? I would look for a paper that takes up a close reading of the speeches, rather than a paper that delves into the specific policies and practices of one particular individual. Trump is an easy target here, but we see Trump making more explicit what other Presidents (or presidential candidates) believe and assume, only these men were able to mask their perspectives more effectively.
In sum, a rewrite here would have to involve a major restructuring of the argument, and the inclusion of the other speeches in the analysis.
For the rewrite, you should draw upon my comments to help guide you through the process. I expect rewrites to be completely revised and restructured efforts that reflect the advice and suggestions provided. If the rewrite shows little or no change from the first version, your grade for the paper may remain the same. In other words, a rewrite does not guarantee a better grade necessarily.
Comments from Customer
PREVIOUS PAPER INSTRUCTIONS (#416871485): First 7-8-page paper DRAFT due on the following topic: Read the speeches:
John F. Kennedy, “Transcript: JFK’s Speech on His Religion,” National Public Radio, December 5, 2007, accessed August 23, 2015, http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=16920600.
Mitt Romney, “Transcript: Mitt Romney’s Faith Speech,” National Public Radio, December 6, 2007, accessed August 23, 2015, http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=16969460.
Barack Obama, “Remarks by the President at the National Prayer Breakfast,” The White House, February 3, 2011, accessed August 23, 2015, https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/02/03/remarks-president-national-prayer-breakfast.
Donald Trump, “State of the Union Address, February 4th, 2020.” National Catholic Reporter, February 6th, 2020, accessed May 18th, 2021, https://www.ncronline.org/news/politics/breaking-down-trumps-religion-heavy-state-union
Then, in a 7-8 page paper, create a solid thesis and argument around one or more of the following: How do Kennedy, Romney, Obama, and Trump define American religious and political values, and American pluralism? What do these values reveal to us about professed American religious “tolerance”? Is “tolerance” a goal we should be shooting for, or can we imagine a different sense of community altogether? For more information on the ambiguous nature of tolerance, search here. Do you think any sort of professed “tolerance” extends to Islam in this country? Do you think any of these presidents would be in support of, or could envision, a Muslim president?

Problem: stresses pilots deal with. General causes of stress and ways Aviation

Problem: stresses pilots deal with. General causes of stress and ways Aviation is fixing the problem.
-attached will be peer reviewed reference on PILOT STRESS
-explain it in more detail and why the problem is significant.
-have clear thesis statement
– must include “Abstract, Introduction, Background 2-3 paragraphs, Literature Review 2-3 PAGE(S), Data Analysis and Results, Conclusions 2-3 paragraphs & Recommendation. 2-3 paragraphs
1. title page
2.Abstract: An abstract is a brief, comprehensive summary of the contents of the paper, including your conclusion and recommendation.
3.Introduction: A brief overview of what you are researching, why, and an overview of your research process (including the main topics you will review). This should be approximately one paragraph.
4. Background: Describe what led to the problem, explain the extent of the problem, and why it is necessary to research and resolve the problem. This should be 2-3 paragraphs.
5. Literature Review: Provide historical background on the area you are researching, provide a contemporary context in which your research is situated, identify any trends in the literature related to your problem, identifies gaps in the literature, draw conclusions based on the literature (what we know about the problem). This should be 2-3 pages just by its self
6. Data Analysis and Results: Through the analysis of data, state your findings. This should be approximately one page.
7.Conclusions: Based on the results of your data, interpret what they mean in the context of your problem and from an industry perspective. This should be 2-3 paragraphs.
8.Recommendation: Based on the results and conclusions, state your recommendation to address the problem. This should be 2-3 paragraphs.
9.Resources(will add to attachment)

INTRODUCTION Evaluation involves making judgments. Evaluation arguments require

INTRODUCTION
Evaluation involves making judgments. Evaluation arguments require you to make a persuasive case for the validity of your judgment.
In this task, you will write an evaluation argument that tries to persuade your readers to accept your reasoned judgment on a topic.
SCENARIO
Note: Choose only one of the following topics for your essay.
• Evaluate the effectiveness of a policy.
• Evaluate the quality of a consumer product.
• Evaluate the benefits of pursuing a specific hobby.
• Evaluate the merits of a specific film or book.
Note: this task requires you to make a claim about the merits of a book, film, product, policy, or hobby and then provide reasons why that claim is true. If you choose to evaluate the merits of a book or film, do not simply summarize the plot; instead, use details from the book or film as evidence to support the claim.
REQUIREMENTS
Your submission must be your original work. No more than a combined total of 30% of the submission and no more than a 10% match to any one individual source can be directly quoted or closely paraphrased from sources, even if cited correctly. An originality report is provided when you submit your task that can be used as a guide.
You must use the rubric to direct the creation of your submission because it provides detailed criteria that will be used to evaluate your work. Each requirement below may be evaluated by more than one rubric aspect. The rubric aspect titles may contain hyperlinks to relevant portions of the course.
Note: When using sources to support ideas and elements in an assessment, the submission MUST include APA formatted in-text citations with a corresponding reference list for any direct quotes or paraphrasing. It is not necessary to list sources that were consulted if they have not been quoted or paraphrased in the text of the assessment.
A. Write an evaluation essay (suggested length of 2–4 pages). In your essay, do the following:
1. Respond to one of the given topics.
2. Provide an effective introduction.
3. Provide an appropriate thesis statement that previews two to four main points.
4. Develop each of the main points with appropriate support in the body of your essay.
5. Provide an effective conclusion.

B. Include at least one academically credible source in the body of your essay.
1. For your sources, include all in-text citations and references in APA format.

C. Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission.
Note: For definitions of terms commonly used in the rubric, see the Rubric Terms web link included in the Evaluation Procedures section.
Note: When using sources to support ideas and elements in an assessment, the submission MUST include APA formatted in-text citations with a corresponding reference list for any direct quotes or paraphrasing. It is not necessary to list sources that were consulted if they have not been quoted or paraphrased in the text of the assessment.
Note: No more than a combined total of 30% of a submission can be directly quoted or closely paraphrased from outside sources, even if cited correctly. For tips on using APA style, please refer to the APA Handout web link included in the APA Guidelines section.

Note: Tasks may not be submitted as cloud links, such as links to Google Docs, Google Slides, OneDrive, etc., unless specified in the task requirements. All other submissions must be file types that are uploaded and submitted as attachments (e.g., .docx, .pdf, .ppt).

INTRODUCTION Non-fiction narrative writing is a way to convey a story or event i

INTRODUCTION
Non-fiction narrative writing is a way to convey a story or event in order to explain or prove a point. For this task, you will need to reflect on how personal experiences have shaped your literacy development. Literacy refers to reading and writing for the purpose of acquiring knowledge. You will write a narrative essay that draws on your personal experiences in order to illustrate an idea. You do not have to complete any research on the topic. Your evidence or support will be in the form of personal experiences, reflections, details, and examples relevant to the idea that you present.
SCENARIO
Note: Choose only one of the following topics for your essay.
• Narrate an experience you had with a writing or reading task that you found (or still find) difficult or challenging. Explain the significance of this experience.
• Describe an important moment or event in your literacy development. Explain the significance of this event.
• Narrate a time when your literacy skills have helped you achieve a personal goal or accomplishment. Explain the significance of this accomplishment.
• Describe a time when you have used reading or writing to learn in an environment other than the classroom. Explain the significance of this event.
REQUIREMENTS
Your submission must be your original work. No more than a combined total of 30% of the submission and no more than a 10% match to any one individual source can be directly quoted or closely paraphrased from sources, even if cited correctly. An originality report is provided when you submit your task that can be used as a guide.
You must use the rubric to direct the creation of your submission because it provides detailed criteria that will be used to evaluate your work. Each requirement below may be evaluated by more than one rubric aspect. The rubric aspect titles may contain hyperlinks to relevant portions of the course.
Note: When using sources to support ideas and elements in an assessment, the submission MUST include APA formatted in-text citations with a corresponding reference list for any direct quotes or paraphrasing. It is not necessary to list sources that were consulted if they have not been quoted or paraphrased in the text of the assessment.
A. Write a narrative essay (suggested length of 750–1,000 words). In your essay, do the following:
1. Respond to one of the given topics.
2. Provide an effective introduction.
3. Provide an appropriate thesis statement.
4. Use narration and description to provide detailed information about the topic.
5. Explain the significance of the narrative details.
6. Provide an effective conclusion.

B. When you use sources, include all in-text citations and references in APA format.

C. Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission.
Note: For definitions of terms commonly used in the rubric, see the Rubric Terms web link included in the Evaluation Procedures section.
Note: When using sources to support ideas and elements in an assessment, the submission MUST include APA formatted in-text citations with a corresponding reference list for any direct quotes or paraphrasing. It is not necessary to list sources that were consulted if they have not been quoted or paraphrased in the text of the assessment.
Note: No more than a combined total of 30% of a submission can be directly quoted or closely paraphrased from outside sources, even if cited correctly. For tips on using APA style, please refer to the APA Handout web link included in the APA Guidelines section.

Note: Tasks may not be submitted as cloud links, such as links to Google Docs, Google Slides, OneDrive, etc., unless specified in the task requirements. All other submissions must be file types that are uploaded and submitted as attachments (e.g., .docx, .pdf, .ppt).
File Restrictions
File name may contain only letters, numbers, spaces, and these symbols: ! – _ . * ‘ ( )
File size limit: 200 MB
File types allowed: doc, docx, rtf, xls, xlsx, ppt, pptx, odt, pdf, txt, qt, mov, mpg, avi, mp3, wav, mp4, wma, flv, asf, mpeg, wmv, m4v, svg, tif, tiff, jpeg, jpg, gif, png, zip, rar, tar, 7z

There is a one page essay due next week. You only have to write on one topic. Ju

There is a one page essay due next week. You only have to write on one topic.
Just make sure your essay is a full page and your separate your ideas into paragraphs. You can have a longer essay.
You can also find links to the articles in the announcements section.
Topic 1
There is an essay on the death penalty written by a former English 1C student. Read over the student essay
You can find the student essay here
You now have some knowledge of what makes a good argument. Does the student write a good argument? Do he use logos, pathos and ethos? Since class likes to use the term persuade was the argument persuasive? In the end what grade would you give the student essay? What grade do you think I gave it?
Topics 2
There is a second article written from the New York Times.
You can find that article New York Times article. link to the article: https://www.nytimes.com/2002/05/13/opinion/who-gets-the-death-penalty.html
What was your reaction to The New York Times article? Was it a persuasive argument? In the end who wrote the better argument, the student essay or the times?
the student article:
The Death Penalty does not work.
There are so many problems with the death penalty it becomes clear it is an immoral and unethical solution to the problem of crime. Should someone who coldheartedly murders their victims be executed by the state? Does someone like William Bonin, who raped, sodomized and strangled many of his victims until they turned blue and died, deserve to live? For many people it is a very easy decision. Many people believe that such a brutal inhuman monster should die to keep society safe. Just ask those few who stood outside San Quentin Prison holding up signs: “BURN, BONIN, BURN.” And with 80 percent of registered California voters supporting capital punishment, those people in front of San Quentin are not a small minority.
However, the death penalty is not an easy answer to an extremely complex problem. If the death penalty works, why did it take 14 years for Bonin to finally be executed? People complain that tax dollars are being wasted on letting those savage killers sit in their cells and watch television all day, yet it is cheaper to let convicted criminals spend the rest of their lives in prison than it does to have them executed. A death-penalty trial costs $592,5000 compared to $93,000 for a non-capital murder. An average of $90 million dollars a year is spent on the death penalty.
These same people may argue that if executions happened more often, it would cut down on the overcrowding in the state prisons. But even if the states executed all death-row inmates, there would still be overcrowding in the prison system. Statistical studies have shown that the death penalty is not a deterrent to criminal behavior. Even if society executed all death row inmates there would still be an overpopulation in our nation’s prison systems. States like Texas put to death 20 to 30 inmates a year. Yet, they receive 300 to 400 new death-row inmates each Capital Punishment is not solving a problem.
Race is a large factor when it comes to who gets sentenced to death. Fifty percent of all death row inmates are black. Defendants who are black are four times more likely to receive death than someone who is white. Statistics have shown that killers of whites are four times more likely to be sentenced to death than a killer of a black. No white person has been sentenced todeath for killing a black or Hispanic victim. And no woman has been executed since the reinstatement of the death penalty by the U.S. Supreme Court back in 1977. Last month Gov. Patoki of New York claimed “Justice has been served” as he signed the new death penalty bill into law. If the death penalty is a measure of fairness and justice, why did prosecutors not seek death in the O.J. Simpson murder trial? If it had been a young, black male from Compton or Watts on trial for the same crime, prosecutors surely would have sought deathMany people choose to ignore these facts or blame them on the liberal media. But, for me, it is I can stare these facts right in the face, but still struggle with the issues. To sympathize with the murderer rather than the families of the victims is wrong It becomes painfully obvious that capital punishment does not work. The studies indicate it is not a deterrent. If the goal is to keep society safe, then locking away an individual for the rest of their life would accomplish that. Never again will they have control over their environment. Never again will they be able to take a shower when they want, walk in a park or turn on the lights when they want. And they will never be able to kill again. After the execution of Bonin, some of the supporters opened a bottle of champagne as if the 49ers had just won another Super Bowl rather than somone had been executed. Maybe some different questions need to be asked. Do we want a society that cheers and celebrates when someone?

The department your major in is exploring innovative strategies to raise money f

The department your major in is exploring innovative strategies to raise money for your degree program. Although they are considering several possible methods at the moment, one of the front-running ideas is to create and sell non-fungible tokens (NFTs), a type of digital asset stored on a blockchain. They want to know if creating and selling NFTs will be a smart, viable, and sustainable fundraising option. Also, perhaps more importantly, they want to know if this option will align with the university’s principles and academic ethos overall.
In an effort to get a fresh perspective on the matter as well as gauge community sentiment, the department is randomly selecting a group of students to weigh-in on the decision-making process. You are one of those students.
For this writing project, you must first research NFTs and inform yourself on the topic, current trends, use cases, blockchain mechanics, and/or any other associated elements. Then, consider the key stakeholders (your department, ASU, etc.) in this scenario and weigh any potential risks or implications that an NFT project may cause/pose. Based on your research and analysis, write a convincing rationale that proposes whether or not your department should create an NFT project to raise funds for your program.
Assume your audience has a basic knowledge of NFTs already. It is not necessary to explain what NFTs are to them.
Avoid using personal pronouns.
Introduce and develop a compelling thesis statement that takes a clear stance on the issue. The thesis statement must make a proposal argument.
Provide necessary context into the issue you have chosen and potentially what’s at stake.
Incorporates credible research, statistics, quotes, and/or evidence from at least six (6) secondary sources to enrich and support your argument.
Stay structured over a clear and logical sequence of claims and subclaims.
Offer a thoughtful conclusion that adequately summarizes the paper’s main ideas and key takeaways.
Include at least six (6) sources from credible secondary sources.
Correct MLA format, including correct in-text citations and a Works Cited page.