Learning Goal: I’m working on a research & summaries question and need an explan

Learning Goal: I’m working on a research & summaries question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.1. Which game company’s forum do you think is the best player community forum on the market? why? What is the difference between it and other forums? Please analyze in depth and explain the reasons in detail.2. What do you think are the most important work content for the community before the game is launched (about 1 month ago), during the launch (about 1 month before and after), and after the game is launched (about 1 month later)? When operating social media, what kind of community indicators should be paid attention to. Please specify the reason.3. (Please use the selected market language and answer according to the provided context)The government organized a creative drawing competition. In order to ensure the rights and interests of the participants, it is stipulated that no plagiarism or secondary processing shall be allowed for the entries. One of the participants won the third place after being judged by the judging and voting by the players. After the list was announced, some players reported plagiarism of his work. According to my legal judgment, this work does not constitute plagiarism, but it is by no means original. Some of his works copied the work of a certain movie hero.Now, 10% of forum users state that the official encourages plagiarism, and 20% think he does not constitute plagiarism. The official has decided to withdraw his qualifications for the second creation.Topic: 1. In the face of this kind of public opinion issue, how should community members deal with it? Please list the handling plan, sequence and announcement content. 2. As a community member, how can you avoid it next time?4. Take Honkai 3 as an example. The Valkyrie’s birthday is coming. Please prepare an event plan and use social media platforms to celebrate her birthday! (Valkyrie chooses arbitrarily)5. Please recommend KOLs suitable for cooperation according to the game characteristics of Honkai 3 and Genshin, and analyze the reasons in depth. The upper limit is 3 respectively.
Requirements: 500

Learning Goal: I’m working on a research & summaries question and need an explan

Learning Goal: I’m working on a research & summaries question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.Each question should be between 450 and not more than 500 words and in total no more than 1500 words for all questions.Please read carefully the questions. Please explain and justify your answersQuestion 1. The main elements of a successful research project consist of the following:
A research title that does not exceed 12 words.
An introduction
A purpose statement:
Research objectives or questions
Conceptual framework: it is a simple model that explains major components in the study and how they relate to one another.
A sound Research Methodology
Data Analysis-Findings
Conclusions and Recommendations
References
Please provide a short description of all these elements and provide the criteria for assessing these elements (use Course slides and the book for your answers, especially Chapter 13 slides for the criteria)Question 2. A hypothetical Team of students at a Research Methodology Class at an MBA program wants to adapt a Case Study Methodology for collecting, analyzing, interpreting and presenting qualitative data. Please explain what a Case Study methodology is, what are the main advantages and disadvantages and provide a Case Study example from your Final Project Literature Review.Question 3. Plagiarism has become a serious issue in academic circles in recent decades. Describe what Plagiarism is. State what the main causes of this problem are and what academic institutions can do to eliminate this phenomenon (provide at least 2-3 references).
Requirements: 450 – 500 words for each question

Learning Goal: I’m working on a research & summaries question and need support t

Learning Goal: I’m working on a research & summaries question and need support to help me learn.This order is to find topics of researches that I want to start, so I want to choose topics based on specific journals then I’ll open new order for each research.Please read carefully, I want you first to look at researches published in the following journals, see the aim and scopes of these journals, also, see the methods they usually accept, CHECK DIFFERENT ISSUES on the journal web.Second, I want you to suggest 10 topics based on the researches published in these journalshttps://www.tandfonline.com/journals/ceds20https://www.tandfonline.com/action/authorSubmission?journalCode=CBRE20&page=instructions#styleThe topic you suggest must be:1- it must be related to (teaching – curriculum – or instruction technology), and if it must be about specific subject, make it (Religious studies). For example, if the sample will be teachers, they will be teachers of religious courses in Saudi Arabia.2- When you suggest a topic, give me small description (informal) tell me: what methods you will use (qualitative- quantitative-or mix methods), and is it systematic review or empirical research? Who is the participant if it is empirical research? If it is about specific region, it will be Saudi Arabia.I will collect data if needed, so I will open multiple orders with same writer till we finish.3- You should give me the name of the research that you follow from the previous journals.Please send me topics with descriptions and sample names of the articles
Requirements: 10

Learning Goal: I’m working on a research & summaries multi-part question and nee

Learning Goal: I’m working on a research & summaries multi-part question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.OverviewFor this Performance Task Assessment, you will critically appraise peer-reviewed articles related to a clinical question or interest and based on the critical appraisal of the articles, recommend a best practice that emerges from the research.Professional Skills: Written Communication, Critical Thinking and Problem Solving, and Information Literacy are assessed in this competency.Your response to this Assessment should:Reflect the criteria provided in the rubric.
Adhere to the required assignment length.
This Assessment requires submission of two (2) documents, a completed Critical Appraisal Worksheet and an evidenced-based practice recommendation response. Save your files as EB004_appraisal_firstinitial_lastname (for example, EB004_appraisal_J_Smith) and EB004_EBP_firstinitial_lastname (for example, EB004_EBP_J_Smith).You may submit a draft of your assignment to the Turnitin Draft Check area to check for authenticity. When you are ready to upload your completed Assessment, use the Assessment tab on the top navigation menu.InstructionsAccess the following to complete this Assessment:Critical Appraisal Worksheet
Before submitting your Assessment, carefully review the rubric. This is the same rubric the Assessor will use to evaluate your submission and it provides detailed criteria describing how to achieve or master the Competency. Many students find that understanding the requirements of the Assessment and the rubric criteria help them direct their focus and use their time most productively.RubricClick each of the items below to complete this assessment.Part 1: Critical Appraisal of ResearchIdentify a clinical issue of interest that can form the basis of a clinical inquiry.
Develop a PICOT question to address this clinical issue of interest.
Using the keywords from the PICOT question, search at least four different databases in the Walden Library to identify at least four relevant peer-reviewed articles at the systematic-reviews level.
Conduct a critical appraisal of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected by completing the Critical Appraisal Worksheet.
Part 2: Evidence-Based Best PracticesBased on your appraisal, recommend a best practice that emerges from the research you reviewed. In a 1- to 2-page narrative, address the following:Explain the best practice that emerged, justifying your proposal with APA citations for the evidenced-based research that you reviewed
A search on a clinical issue, using a Problem-Intervention-Comparison-Outcome-Time (PICOT) question, might yield few or many results. Regardless of the quantity, however, literature findings must be critically appraised for reliability and relevance to a particular question.Chapter 5 of Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing & Healthcare: A Guide to Best Practice explores guidelines for the critical appraisal of quantitative research, including the four phases of critical appraisal, three questions to ask of all studies, and how recommendations for practice come from a body of evidence. Chapter 6 provides guidance for critically appraising qualitative studies, including the impact that qualitative evidence has on clinical decision-making, unique language and concepts that are encountered in qualitative literature, and critical appraisal criteria. The article that follows describes how a medical team critically appraises the evidence they have found to answer a clinical question. The video program discusses how to appraise research. In your Competency Assessment, you will critically appraise peer-reviewed articles and, based on your appraisal, suggest a best practice that emerges from the research.TEXTBOOK: EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE IN NURSING & HEALTHCARE: A GUIDE TO BEST PRACTICEMelnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2018).Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare:A guide to best practice (4th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer. Chapter 5, “Critically Appraising Quantitative Evidence for Clinical Decision Making” (pp.124–188)
Chapter 6, “Critically Appraising Qualitative Evidence for Clinical Decision Making” (pp. 189–218)
Time Estimate: 60 minARTICLE:EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE: STEP BY STEP: CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF THE EVIDENCE: PART 1Evidence-Based Practice: Step by Step: Critical Appraisal of the Evidence: Part 1Fineout-Overholt, E., Melnyk, B. M., Stillwell, S. B., & Williamson, K. M. (2010). Evidence-based practice: Step by step: Critical appraisal of the evidence: Part I. American Journal of Nursing, 110(7), 47–52. doi:10.1097/01.NAJ.0000383935.22721.9cNote: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.
Time Estimate: 30 minVIDEO: APPRAISING THE RESEARCH (8:56)Walden University, LLC. (2018-2021). Appraising the research [Video]. Walden University Brightspace. https://mytempo.waldenu.eduTranscript: Appraising the research (PDF)Getting StartedOnce you have located multiple bodies of evidence that answer a clinical question, how do you determine which are most germane to your own situation? Critically appraising literature requires skills in synthesizing information to determine similarities and differences between studies. The articles and video program that follow provide guidance in conducting a critical appraisal as well as the synthesis process. The critical appraisal of qualitative studies, which differs from that of quantitative studies, is also examined. Consider this information as you conduct a critical appraisal of peer-reviewed articles for your Competency Assessment.ARTICLE: EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE: STEP BY STEP: CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF THE EVIDENCE: PART II: DIGGING DEEPER—EXAMINING THE “KEEPER” STUDIESEvidence-Based Practice: Step by Step: Critical Appraisal of the Evidence: Part II: Digging Deeper—Examining the “Keeper” StudiesFineout-Overholt, E., Melnyk, B. M., Stillwell, S. B., & Williamson, K. M. (2010). Evidence-based practice: Step by step: Critical appraisal of the evidence: Part II: Digging deeper – examining the “keeper” studies. American Journal of Nursing, 110(9), 41–48. doi:10.1097/01.NAJ.0000388264.49427.f9Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases
Time Estimate: 45 minARTICLE: EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE: STEP BY STEP: CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF THE EVIDENCE: PART III: THE PROCESS OF SYNTHESIS: SEEING SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES ACROSS THE BODY OF EVIDENCEEvidence-Based Practice: Step by Step: Critical Appraisal of the Evidence: Part III: The Process of Synthesis: Seeing Similarities and Differences Across the Body of EvidenceFineout-Overholt, E., Melnyk, B. M., Stillwell, S. B., & Williamson, K. M. (2010). Evidence-based practice: Step by step: Critical appraisal of the evidence: Part III: The process of synthesis: Seeing similarities and differences across the body of evidence. American Journal of Nursing, 110(11), 43–51.Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.
Time Estimate: 45 minARTICLE: EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE: CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF QUALITATIVE EVIDENCEEvidence-Based Practice: Critical Appraisal of Qualitative EvidenceWilliamson, K. M. (2009). Evidence-based practice: Critical appraisal of qualitative evidence. Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association, 15(3), 202–207. doi:10.1177/107839030933873Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.
Time Estimate: 30 minVIDEO: APPRAISING THE RESEARCH: INTERPRETING STATISTICS (10:15)Walden University, LLC. (2018-2021). Appraising the research: Interpreting statistics [Video]. Walden University Brightspace. https://mytempo.waldenu.eduTranscript: Appraising the Research: Interpreting Statistics (PDF)
Requirements: as indicated

Learning Goal: I’m working on a research & summaries question and need support t

Learning Goal: I’m working on a research & summaries question and need support to help me learn.This order is to find topics of researches that I want to start, so I want to choose topics based on specific journals then I’ll open new order for each research.Please read carefully, I want you first to look at researches published in the following journals, see the aim and scopes of these journals, also, see the methods they usually accept, CHECK DIFFERENT ISSUES on the journal web.Second, I want you to suggest 10 topics based on the researches published in these journalshttps://www.tandfonline.com/journals/ceds20https://www.tandfonline.com/action/authorSubmission?journalCode=CBRE20&page=instructions#styleThe topic you suggest must be:1- it must be related to (teaching – curriculum – or instruction technology), and if it must be about specific subject, make it (Religious studies). For example, if the sample will be teachers, they will be teachers of religious courses in Saudi Arabia.2- When you suggest a topic, give me small description (informal) tell me: what methods you will use (qualitative- quantitative-or mix methods), and is it systematic review or empirical research? Who is the participant if it is empirical research? If it is about specific region, it will be Saudi Arabia.I will collect data if needed, so I will open multiple orders with same writer till we finish.3- You should give me the name of the research that you follow from the previous journals.Please send me topics with descriptions and sample names of the articles
Requirements: 10

Learning Goal: I’m working on a research & summaries multi-part question and nee

Learning Goal: I’m working on a research & summaries multi-part question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.OverviewFor this Performance Task Assessment, you will critically appraise peer-reviewed articles related to a clinical question or interest and based on the critical appraisal of the articles, recommend a best practice that emerges from the research.Professional Skills: Written Communication, Critical Thinking and Problem Solving, and Information Literacy are assessed in this competency.Your response to this Assessment should:Reflect the criteria provided in the rubric.
Adhere to the required assignment length.
This Assessment requires submission of two (2) documents, a completed Critical Appraisal Worksheet and an evidenced-based practice recommendation response. Save your files as EB004_appraisal_firstinitial_lastname (for example, EB004_appraisal_J_Smith) and EB004_EBP_firstinitial_lastname (for example, EB004_EBP_J_Smith).You may submit a draft of your assignment to the Turnitin Draft Check area to check for authenticity. When you are ready to upload your completed Assessment, use the Assessment tab on the top navigation menu.InstructionsAccess the following to complete this Assessment:Critical Appraisal Worksheet
Before submitting your Assessment, carefully review the rubric. This is the same rubric the Assessor will use to evaluate your submission and it provides detailed criteria describing how to achieve or master the Competency. Many students find that understanding the requirements of the Assessment and the rubric criteria help them direct their focus and use their time most productively.RubricClick each of the items below to complete this assessment.Part 1: Critical Appraisal of ResearchIdentify a clinical issue of interest that can form the basis of a clinical inquiry.
Develop a PICOT question to address this clinical issue of interest.
Using the keywords from the PICOT question, search at least four different databases in the Walden Library to identify at least four relevant peer-reviewed articles at the systematic-reviews level.
Conduct a critical appraisal of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected by completing the Critical Appraisal Worksheet.
Part 2: Evidence-Based Best PracticesBased on your appraisal, recommend a best practice that emerges from the research you reviewed. In a 1- to 2-page narrative, address the following:Explain the best practice that emerged, justifying your proposal with APA citations for the evidenced-based research that you reviewed
A search on a clinical issue, using a Problem-Intervention-Comparison-Outcome-Time (PICOT) question, might yield few or many results. Regardless of the quantity, however, literature findings must be critically appraised for reliability and relevance to a particular question.Chapter 5 of Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing & Healthcare: A Guide to Best Practice explores guidelines for the critical appraisal of quantitative research, including the four phases of critical appraisal, three questions to ask of all studies, and how recommendations for practice come from a body of evidence. Chapter 6 provides guidance for critically appraising qualitative studies, including the impact that qualitative evidence has on clinical decision-making, unique language and concepts that are encountered in qualitative literature, and critical appraisal criteria. The article that follows describes how a medical team critically appraises the evidence they have found to answer a clinical question. The video program discusses how to appraise research. In your Competency Assessment, you will critically appraise peer-reviewed articles and, based on your appraisal, suggest a best practice that emerges from the research.TEXTBOOK: EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE IN NURSING & HEALTHCARE: A GUIDE TO BEST PRACTICEMelnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2018).Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare:A guide to best practice (4th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer. Chapter 5, “Critically Appraising Quantitative Evidence for Clinical Decision Making” (pp.124–188)
Chapter 6, “Critically Appraising Qualitative Evidence for Clinical Decision Making” (pp. 189–218)
Time Estimate: 60 minARTICLE:EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE: STEP BY STEP: CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF THE EVIDENCE: PART 1Evidence-Based Practice: Step by Step: Critical Appraisal of the Evidence: Part 1Fineout-Overholt, E., Melnyk, B. M., Stillwell, S. B., & Williamson, K. M. (2010). Evidence-based practice: Step by step: Critical appraisal of the evidence: Part I. American Journal of Nursing, 110(7), 47–52. doi:10.1097/01.NAJ.0000383935.22721.9cNote: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.
Time Estimate: 30 minVIDEO: APPRAISING THE RESEARCH (8:56)Walden University, LLC. (2018-2021). Appraising the research [Video]. Walden University Brightspace. https://mytempo.waldenu.eduTranscript: Appraising the research (PDF)Getting StartedOnce you have located multiple bodies of evidence that answer a clinical question, how do you determine which are most germane to your own situation? Critically appraising literature requires skills in synthesizing information to determine similarities and differences between studies. The articles and video program that follow provide guidance in conducting a critical appraisal as well as the synthesis process. The critical appraisal of qualitative studies, which differs from that of quantitative studies, is also examined. Consider this information as you conduct a critical appraisal of peer-reviewed articles for your Competency Assessment.ARTICLE: EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE: STEP BY STEP: CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF THE EVIDENCE: PART II: DIGGING DEEPER—EXAMINING THE “KEEPER” STUDIESEvidence-Based Practice: Step by Step: Critical Appraisal of the Evidence: Part II: Digging Deeper—Examining the “Keeper” StudiesFineout-Overholt, E., Melnyk, B. M., Stillwell, S. B., & Williamson, K. M. (2010). Evidence-based practice: Step by step: Critical appraisal of the evidence: Part II: Digging deeper – examining the “keeper” studies. American Journal of Nursing, 110(9), 41–48. doi:10.1097/01.NAJ.0000388264.49427.f9Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases
Time Estimate: 45 minARTICLE: EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE: STEP BY STEP: CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF THE EVIDENCE: PART III: THE PROCESS OF SYNTHESIS: SEEING SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES ACROSS THE BODY OF EVIDENCEEvidence-Based Practice: Step by Step: Critical Appraisal of the Evidence: Part III: The Process of Synthesis: Seeing Similarities and Differences Across the Body of EvidenceFineout-Overholt, E., Melnyk, B. M., Stillwell, S. B., & Williamson, K. M. (2010). Evidence-based practice: Step by step: Critical appraisal of the evidence: Part III: The process of synthesis: Seeing similarities and differences across the body of evidence. American Journal of Nursing, 110(11), 43–51.Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.
Time Estimate: 45 minARTICLE: EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE: CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF QUALITATIVE EVIDENCEEvidence-Based Practice: Critical Appraisal of Qualitative EvidenceWilliamson, K. M. (2009). Evidence-based practice: Critical appraisal of qualitative evidence. Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association, 15(3), 202–207. doi:10.1177/107839030933873Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.
Time Estimate: 30 minVIDEO: APPRAISING THE RESEARCH: INTERPRETING STATISTICS (10:15)Walden University, LLC. (2018-2021). Appraising the research: Interpreting statistics [Video]. Walden University Brightspace. https://mytempo.waldenu.eduTranscript: Appraising the Research: Interpreting Statistics (PDF)
Requirements: as indicated